The Ripple: Cheering on our Native Trout!
Native Trout vs. Finned-Zombies: the Essential Difference
Purples, reds and greens thrown high like hard candies, caught by each branch tip that shakes in the soft warming breeze;
our winter dun hills flare up in their pointillist fervors, a rolling canvas of vivacious colors that blend and bleed and swarm ‘til we can’t see the ridgelines or hollows;
hawks and falcons and eagles circle above our busy ant movements in parking lots, farm fields and backyards;
sweet tulips burst and bend over, taking their bows:
the snow melts and sugarings are suddenly memories;
and amorous fish arrive from far out at sea, crowding the rumbling spillways of Holyoke Dam, hoping to catch a ride on a world-famous elevator, so they may have babies upriver where their parents once did.
(This year the Holyoke Gas & Electric visitors’ center is closed, while it prepares and constructs “new downstream fish passage structures” that might prevent the extinction of the shortnose sturgeon.)
Elsewhere, trout fishers pay for their licenses, drive long distances, pull on their waders, plunge into cold flow, flip flies into pools where aquarium-raised pellet-fed fish might cluster, and hope. They know, more or less, their favorite river has, in the words of a recent New York Times op-ed, become a monoculture factory farm:
“For more than a century, government stocking efforts and more recent well-intentioned but illegal introductions of fish by anglers have wreaked havoc on native trout and other fish species. Seven species of native trout are considered threatened and others have become extinct because of interbreeding and competition from nonnative trout and other game fish introduced into freshwater streams. Despite these problems, most trout stocked this year will be nonnative to the streams and rivers where they will be released.”
Factory-raised trout have no clue where they are, or even how to hunt for food, and are helpless, hapless imbeciles; yet, for today’s trout fishers just getting into the river, wearing those waders and using that gear, is what it’s all about, even if it’s just a simulation of what they really want to do—catch big, fat, beautiful native trout like the one’s they see their granddads holding in the family picture album.
Native trout do survive the century of US Fish & Wildlife Service mismanagement in tiny brooks up in our hilltown headlands, but they are miniature now, having shrunken drastically in size to suit the conditions of their present habitat. There is no doubt that, if the US Fish & Wildlife Service would stop the stocking and overfishing for a few decades, our native trout would descend from their pools of exile and return to their homes in the main courses of our rivers; there they would find plenty of native benthic invertebrates (water bugs) to eat and ample places to breed; in a few generations they would return to normal size, and trout fishers would again be fishing for the trout they want to fish for. Will this ever happen?
It might! But not because the government agents who get paid to “conserve” and “protect” our rivers will make it happen. Presently, they have no monetary or cultural incentive to revive the health of our rivers; in fact, they enjoy the annual photos local newspapers publish of them each spring, as they “teach” schoolchildren how to dump finned-zombies into the water.
(Dear ecologically-aware parents, please teach your children what is really happening here! Trout stocking hides the fact the fact that our rivers are not being taken care of; they are, by historical standards, dead.)
Our native trouts’ best chance at returning to normal size and abundant populations is the termination of the stocking industry due to cutbacks in government spending. Stocking rivers with finned-zombies is expensive, very complicated and unsustainable. As we have seen again and again, when politicians need things to cut, “environmental programs” are the first to go. Soon enough, as we face the costs of, say, rebuilding our public transportation infrastructures, trout-stocking will be viewed as a “luxury.” Ironically enough, this will restore our native trout populations to historical norms—if overfishing is prevented. Will that happen?
Why not find out, by volunteering to help your local river revive itself? More than ever our rivers—and other river-lovers—need us. The Massachusetts Department of Ecological Restoration has published a list & calendar of river-helping opportunities. This local offering is a perfect way for those of us who want to do something, to do it:
Saturday, May 9, 9am-1pm – WESTFIELD RIVER: “Walkin’ the Watershed” training, sponsored by the Westfield Wild and Scenic River Committee. “See how easy and fun it is to monitor a section of the river. Skills needed: a love of water and the ability to walk along a river bank.” Contact Meredyth Babcock at 413-623-2070 or firstname.lastname@example.org for more info.
[Photo credit: (cc) Eliot Kimber]
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Kurt Heidinger, Ph.D. is the Executive Director of Biocitizen, non-profit school of field environmental philosophy, based in the Western MA Hilltown of Westhampton, MA where he lives with his family. Biocitizen gives participants an opportunity to “think outside” and cultivate a joyous and empowering biocultural awareness of where we live and who we are. Check out Kurt’s monthly column, The Ripple, here on Hilltown Families on the 4th Monday of every month to hear his stories about rivers in our region. Make the world of rivers bigger than the world of pavement inside of you!